The dialogue of discourse ethics and philosophy of liberation
Keywords:
hilosophy of liberation, ethics, discourseAbstract
We consider this new born XXI’st century the one of plurality, difference and dialogue. An example of our statement —given at the end of the XXth century— was the philosophical exchange between E. Dussel and K.o. Apel. This paper shows the outstanding conclusions of each of the participants as results of reflecting on each others view: But, before, we expose the historical and philosophical beginning of discourse ethics (Apel) and ethics of liberation (Dussel), we will introduce to the basic conceptual elements of each theory. As conclusions of the dialogue we describe the ethical conceptions in both authors, their views, the role of ethics in a globalized world, the basic sources to face moral problems, etc. Finally, to make sense of the polemic and conclusions raised by both philosophers, we state the most important aftermaths on the contemporary moral life.
References
K.-O. Apel. "El 'a priori' de la comunidad de comunicación", en La transformación de la filosofía. Madrid: Taurus, 1985.
K.-O Apel. "El problema de la evidencia fenomenológica a la luz de una semiótica trascendental", en G. Vattimo (comp.). La secularización de la filosofía. Hermenéutica y posmodernidad. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1992.
E. Dussel. Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y de la exclusión. Madrid: Trotta, 1998.
E. Dussel. "Arquitectónica de la ética de la liberación", en E. Dussel. La ética de la liberación, ante el desafío de Apel, Taylor y Vattimo. Con respuesta crítica inédita de K. -O. Apel. Toluca: UAEM, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2001 UMSNH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.