Philosophical Sociology: Fifteen years of a research programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35830/devenires.v25i50.970Keywords:
Sociology, Philosophy, Humanism, AnthropcentrismAbstract
This brief text summarizes the main assumptions and theses of the research program of Philosophical Sociology. Taking as its starting point the tradition of Philosophical Anthropology of the first half of the last century, Philosophical Sociology argues that, as a species, humans have a set of anthropological properties that make the production and reproduction of the social possible. That is to say, these are general properties that, although they are socioculturally actualized, maintain a high level of autonomy in relation to the contexts. The article reviews three of the distinctive dimensions of Philosophical Sociology: (1) its commitment to a humanist but not anthropocentric position; (2) the post-metaphysical justification of its universalist orientation; (3) the centrality of the concept of “normative idea” to capture the way in which moral ideas are deployed in life.
References
Alexander, J. C. (1995) “Modern, anti, post and neo”, The New Left Review March/ April: 63-101.
Althusser, L. (2003 [1966-7]) The humanist controversy and other writings, Londres: Verso.
Archer, M. S. (2000) Being human. The problem of agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2009 [1995]) Teoría social realista. El enfoque morfogenético, Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
Bachelard, G. (2002 [1938]) The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen.
Blumenberg, H. (2011 [2006]) Descripción del ser humano. Buenos Aires: FCE.
Bourdieu, P. (1994) Sociology in question, London: Sage.
Braidotti, R. (2013) The posthuman, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cassirer, E. (1993 [1944]) Antropología filosófica, Santiago: FCE.
Chernilo, D. (2011) La pretensión universalista de la teoría social, Santiago: Lom.
Chernilo, D. (2013) The natural law foundations of modern social theory. A quest foruniversalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chernilo, D. (2014) ‘The idea of philosophical sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 65 (2): 338-357.
Chernilo, D. (2017) Debating humanity. Towards a philosophical sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chernilo, D. (2021) Sociología filosófica. Ensayos sobre normatividad social, Santiago: Lom.
Chernilo, D. (2023). ‘On the relationships between critical theory and secularization: The challenges of democratic fallibility and planetary survival’, European Journal of Social Theory 26 (2): 282-300.
Chernilo, D. y Fine, R. (2013) “Introduction to the special issue on social theory and natural law”, Journal of Classical Sociology 13 (2), 191-196.
Chernilo, D. y Raza-Mejía, S. (2023) ‘The “normative turn” in sociological theory: Sociology’s garden of the forking paths’, Civic Sociology 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1525/cs.2022.55639.
Fassin, D. (2019) “Humanism. A critical reappraisal”, Critical Times 2 (1): 29-38.
Fine, R. (2021 [2001]) Investigaciones políticas. Hegel, Marx, Arendt, Metales Pesados: Santiago.
Fromm, E. (2022 [1973]) Anatomía de la destructividad humana, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Foucault, M. (2000 [1966]) Las palabras y las cosas. Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Gehlen, A. (1980 [1949]) Man in the age of technology, Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Habermas, J. (1990 [1988]) Pensamiento postmetafísico, Madrid: Taurus.
Habermas, J. (1992 [1981]) Teoría de la acción comunicativa, I. Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social, Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Habermas, J. (2006 [2005]) Entre naturalismo y religión. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Habermas, J. (2023 [2019]) Also a history of philosophy. Vo 1. The Project of a genealogy of postmetaphysical thinking, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haraway, D (1991) Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, London: Free Association Books.
Heidegger, M. (2000 [1947]) Carta sobre el humanismo. Madrid: Alianza, 2000.
Jaspers, K. (2017 [1949]) Origen y meta de la historia, Madrid: Acantilado.
Kymlicka, W. (2018) “Human rights without human supremacism”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6): 763-792.
Löwith, K. (1993 [1932]) Max Weber and Karl Marx, London: Routledge.
Luhmann, N. (2007 [1997]) La sociedad de la sociedad. México: Herder / Universidad Iberoamericana.
Maritain, J. (1939) “Integral humanism and the crisis of modern times”, The Review of Politics 1 (1): 1-17.
Mignolo, W. (2011) The darker side of Western modernity. Global futures, decolonial options, Durham: Duke University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2006) Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Plessner, H. (1970 [1941]) Laughing and crying. A study of the limits of human behavior, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Rosa, H. (2019 [2016]) Resonance. A sociology of our relationship to the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rossello, D. (2017) “All in the (human) family? Species aristocratism in the return of human dignity”, Political Theory 45 (6): 749-771.
Sartre, J.P (2009[1946]) El existencialismo es un humanismo, Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
Scheler, M. (2009 [1928]) The human place in the cosmos, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sloterdijk, P. (2000 [1999]) Notas para el parque humano, Madrid: Ciruela.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UMSNH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.