Complex citizenships and cultural diversity
Keywords:
citizenship, cultural diversity, illustrationAbstract
This paper critically analyzes the incoherencies of the Enlightenment project and the liberal democracy to propose some radical renewals to lead us into the original ideals of freedom, equity and solidarity. First, we discuss the abstract and non-differentiable concept of “citizenship” —heritage of Enlightenment and modernity— to go further of this locked discussion. If we start from philosophical hermeneutics —as an apology of open speeches—, it will be possible a new conception of “complex and differentiable citizenships” to be reflected on the problems of the right of the land, cultural belongings, the plural state and sovereignty of Indians. Finally, we balance the Mexican and Anglo-Saxon multicultural contribution, outstanding the meaning of “interculturalizing” public spheres and inclusive democracies, as well as the importance of the “sociedad civil” in democratic life.
References
Victoria Camps. El malestar de la vida pública. Barcelona: Grijalbo, 1996.
Will Kymlicka. "Derechos individuales y derechos de grupo en la democracia liberal", en: Isegoría, No. 14. Madrid, 1996a.
Will Kymlicka. Ciudadanía multicultural. Barcelona: Paidós, 1996b.
Will Kymlicka. Politics in the vernacular. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
John Rawls. Derecho de gentes. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.
Charles Taylor. El multiculturalismo y la política del reconocimiento. México D.F.: F.C.E., 1993.
Luis Villoro. Estado plural, pluralidad de culturas. México D.F.: Paidós, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 UMSNH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.